You may then use drag and drop between Explorer and WinSCP. Alternatively you can go wild and have WinSCP desguise itself as Windows Explorer window! Ooh! Yeah, it's actually not that sweet. You can choose the rather standard commander type interface with two screens, one focusing on your local drives, the other on the remote storage. WinSCP greets you with the option of running it in two modes. Of course, you can't have much to improve when the main function is to transfer files, but some small features may go a long way in helping you accomplish this with ease. But if there’s a big discrepancy between the bandwidth and the network delay, even that 1 MB can be too small to saturate the bandwidth.While still looking for an alternative to FileZilla, WinSCP appeared to be shinier. For example WinSCP can request up to 32 chunks for 32 KB each at once, totaling 1 MB (these are defaults which can be altered with SFTPDownloadQueue and SFTPUploadQueue raw session settings). Most SFTP clients (including WinSCP) overcome the problem by both requesting/sending a large chunk of the file in each single read/write request and by sending (queuing) multiple requests without waiting for a response to previous. If the client spends this time uselessly waiting, your transfer speed will be low. When transferring, the SFTP client (WinSCP) sends a read/write request to the SFTP server, waits for a response and repeats, until the end of the file.Įven if your connection is fast, if the server is far away (or slow), it takes a time for the response to arrive back. Network delay/latency affects particularly SFTP, as it is a packet oriented-protocol.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |